A friend recently advanced the notion that one of our political parties is more “right” than the other when it comes to economic policy. As an admitted layman in economics, I disagree:

—–

Interesting that you’d specifically mention macroeconomic policy, as it may be considered particularly confounding as the subject of an exercise seeking to discern “right” from “wrong.” Approaches and proposals – along with underlying principles – vary between the two major political parties, sure, but to unequivocally deem one as altogether more economically sound or, dare I say it, *enlightened* than the other seems disingenuous.

From the 2008 economic stimulus to recent quantitative easing, I could line up for you an equivalent number of economics doctoral degrees and professional accolades on either of two polarized viewpoints. “The amount of the stimulus should be doubled.” “There should be no stimulus at all.” “QE is critical in loosening credit markets.” “QE encourages risky investment at exactly the wrong time.” No statement above is correct, none is incorrect; each has sound economic theory which can (and has) been cited in its favor.

More to the point, if there were instilled in me a personal bias, I could line up for you a greater number of economic doctoral degrees and profession accolades on either side of two polarized viewpoints, the viewpoint of my choosing. This is convenient for my political agenda; I can leverage the sheer complexity and, really, nuance attached to (macro)economics to form in the shroud a convincing argument that serves my purpose. It is not crucial for my agenda that my argument be “right;” it is more important that it be polarizing, feigning a bright line where none exists.

Economics is fodder for this, as it can be so difficult to quantify. Compounding the matter is the fact that meaningful retrospection is tough because causality is so elusive. As for “right” and “wrong,” though, neither is neither. The “whole point” I originally mentioned (somewhat in passing, wasn’t it?) alludes to the fact that we are constructed (politically) so that powers (i.e., parties) – neither more correct than the other – gnash teeth and thump chests, fighting with equal conviction to accomplish their respective myopic visions and, in doing so, arrive at something in between. Neither party was meant to succeed entirely, nor would we want them to; even the staunchest partisan would find him or herself regretting the unilateral success of his or her own party.

Recently, a couple of friends have tapped me (or did I volunteer?) to spec out parts for a new gaming rig. The first friend was looking in the $500-600 range in order to get his League of Legends on, the second wants to replace his aging PC before the WoW expansions drops in a week or two. I figured I would capture here what I came up with.

The $500 (oh, okay, “sub-$600”) gaming rig.

This did prove a little challenging. The price point is low enough where some serious consideration has to be given to where to cut corners and still outfit what can be considered a complete PC. Admittedly, I assembled this list a few months ago, so prices may have dropped and “best value” components shifted a bit since then (gotta love technology).

Motherboard: ASUS M5A97 R2.0 Socket AM3+ ATX ($90)

CPU: AMD FX-6300 Vishera 6-Core 3.5GHz (4.1GHz Turbo) Socket AM3+ ($110)

Video Card: EVGA 02G-P4-2742-KR GeForce GT 740 Superclocked 2GB 128-Bit DDR3 ($90)

Memory: CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) ($80)

Power Supply: CORSAIR CX series CX600 600W ATX12V v2.3 ($80)

Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 1TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA ($55)

Optical Drive: Asus or Samsung ($20)

Case: Antec Three Hundred ($65)

Total cost: $590

Upgrades that could be made to the above:

Video Card: EVGA 03G-P4-2667-KR G-SYNC Support GeForce GTX 660 FTW Signature 2 3GB 192-bit GDDR5 (+$90)

CPU/Motherboard: Upgrade to Intel i5 (+$150)

New total cost: $830

Downgrades that could be made to above:

Motherboard: Asus to MSI (-$20)

PSU: 600w to 500w PSU (-$15)

Memory: 8GB to 4GB (-$40)

New total cost: $515

The $1k gaming rig.

A little more breathing room here, but (and it’s a big ‘but’) this particular friend has his sights set on a Core i7. There goes about a third of the budget.

He was also looking at a pre-built (some great values to be had here) system, the ASUS M32AD-US032S Desktop PC, selling for $969, which comes with the following specs:

Intel Core i7 4790 (3.6GHz)

Chipset: Intel H81

16GB DDR3 2TB HDD

Windows 8.1 64-Bit

NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 4 GB

300W PSU

I sought to come up with a similarly priced alternative that might be more tuned to the discerning builder/gamer. A few notes driving my decision-making:

• The box above is put together by Asus, and Asus knows what it’s doing. I’m fairly certain it’s going to run your games just fine, and right out of the box, no less. That said…
• 300w struck me as a borderline. Again, I’m sure the PC is going to run fine, but how about a little overhead for those future upgrades?
• I couldn’t find much information on the specific components actually used…I’m going to go ahead and venture they’ll be mainly Asus, but who knows. When *I* build a system, though, I _do_ know.
• There is some real value here to those who need a Windows license, which are running north of $100 a pop right now. I disregard such license in my builds, but if you need one, that’s $100 right off the bat.
• Input devices. It’s not much of a consideration for me – I like to latch onto my own – but the Asus prebuilt comes with keyboard and mouse.

My answer to the Asus pre-built:

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790 Haswell Quad-Core 3.6GHz LGA 1150 ($310)

Video Card: EVGA 03G-P4-2667-KR G-SYNC Support GeForce GTX 660 FTW Signature 2 3GB 192-bit GDDR5 ($180)

Motherboard: ASUS Z97-A LGA 1150 Intel Z97 ($150)

Memory: CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) ($80)

Power Supply: CORSAIR CX series CX600 600W ATX12V v2.3 ($80)

Hard Drive: Seagate Hybrid Drive ST1000DX001 1TB MLC/8GB 64MB Cache SATA ($80)

Case: Antec Nine Hundred ($95) or Antec Three Hundred ($65)

Total cost: $975

The above gets you into features offered by the Z97 chipset that the H81 does not have. I also give the video card a pretty serious bump. I cut corners with memory, going from 16GB to 8GB. Some people will scream about this, but 8GB is going to be fine right now and RAM is a straightforward upgrade down the line. I spec a robust power supply with room to grow, and an accompanying big, cool, quiet Antec Nine Hundred. I sacrificed some storage in exchange for the speed benefits of Hybrid. If you’re hoarding media, that might prove unpalatable, but I might also recommend going out and getting a giant, slow(er) drive for such things (unless you’re doing a bunch of editing of said media, etc., in which case you’re peripheral to my target audience, anyway).

As usual, I’m amazed at the caliber of hardware that can be gotten for a reasonable price. I put a rig together about four years ago, in that ~$1k range, and it still goes strong with WoW (the only game I still really play, on occasion) cranked. The more demanding games, running at higher resolutions (1080p widescreen, etc.) than what I’m running would make it sweat, I’m sure, but my general point is that you can reasonably expect to get some quality time from a system in this range. Even the “sub-$600” system offers some upgrade paths that will keep you chugging for a bit.